History proves Israel ...
Page 1
History has repeatedly shown that the Israeli regime struggles to endure conventional warfare. This lack of staying power is evident in its pattern of short-lived conflicts—be it the 5-day war, the 6-day war, or the 33-day war. Given this historical trend, the short duration of the latest war was predictable.
Iran’s “Kheibar Shekan 2” missiles played a key role with superior maneuverability designed to evade advanced air defense systems. They still remain a serious threat to Israel. Just two days before the cease-fire, I predicted that if Iran maintained its missile strikes, Israel would be forced to back down.
Israel’s defense systems, including the US-supplied THAAD batteries, were stretched to their limits and failed to deliver the performance expected. This exposed serious vulnerabilities in Israel’s layered defense shield. The Kheibar Shekan 2, with its speed and agility, repeatedly proved capable of penetrating Israeli defenses and continues to serve as one of Iran’s most effective tools of deterrence.
For years, the Israeli regime has banked heavily on its internal stability and hardened infrastructure. But the cracks that appeared during and after this war suggest that its capacity to withstand even a limited-duration conflict is far weaker than previously thought. As a result, the likelihood of Israel sustaining a full 12-day war in the future now appears slim.