Pezeshkian projected national ...
Page 1
His conduct has been praised for its awareness and effectiveness, though it could have been sharper to avert war altogether. Still, given that the conflict was ultimately imposed by adversaries, the blame lies elsewhere.
A more assertive and agile Iranian approach in nuclear negotiations with the US might have prevented the war. President Donald Trump, now in his second term, has shown himself to be a figure that can be dealt with. Iran should have taken the reins in managing Trump, rather than allowing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to steer the course.
One of Pezeshkian’s standout achievements has been his effort to bridge the gap between the public and the political establishment. This was evident in the national solidarity that followed Israel’s attacks on Iranian soil. His people-oriented policies over the past year laid the groundwork for what became a national epic of unity in the face of aggression—an expression of sovereignty that compelled the enemy to propose a cease-fire.
Another key decision was his resistance to implementing the “Hijab and Chastity Law.” This move likely prevented an internal rift at a time when national unity proved vital. In retrospect, this resistance played a significant role in enabling the show of collective strength that emerged during the conflict.
One of the Pezeshkian administration’s core campaign promises was to be “the voice of the voiceless.” That promise now seems fulfilled, as citizens see their voices reflected in the administration’s actions. This resonance between public sentiment and state policy has made the government a source of renewed hope for many. It is a crucial asset—one that must be preserved with care and foresight. If maintained, this social capital could become a powerful force for overcoming future crises and pushing national agendas forward.