Why Saudi Arabia backs Trump’s Iran deal but not Obama’s
By Vivian Nereim
Reporter
Ten years ago, when US president Barack Obama and other leaders reached a deal with Iran to limit its nuclear program, Saudi Arabia was dismayed.
Saudi officials called it a “weak deal” that had only emboldened the kingdom’s regional rival, Iran. They cheered when President Trump withdrew from the agreement a few years later.
Now, as the second Trump administration negotiates with Iran on a deal that might have very similar contours to the previous one, the view from Saudi Arabia looks quite different.
The kingdom’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement recently saying that it hoped the talks, mediated by neighboring Oman, would enhance “peace in the region and the world”.
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman even dispatched his brother, Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman, to Tehran, where he was received warmly by Iranian officials dressed in military regalia. He then hand-delivered a letter to Iran’s Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.
What changed? Relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran have warmed over the past decade. As important, Saudi Arabia is in the middle of an economic diversification program intended to transform the kingdom from being overly dependent on oil into a business, technology, and tourism hub. The prospect of Iranian drones and missiles flying over Saudi Arabia because of regional tensions poses a serious threat to that plan.
“Their mindset is different today,” said Kristin Smith Diwan, a senior scholar. “Under Obama, the [Persian] Gulf States feared US and Iran rapprochement that would isolate them. Under Trump, they fear US and Iran escalation that would target them.”
Iran and the United States wrapped up a second round of diplomatic talks over Tehran’s nuclear activities on Saturday, setting an agenda for rapid-paced negotiations. Mr. Trump has been vague about the objectives of the negotiations, other than to repeat that Iran must never get a nuclear bomb. But Iranian officials say the deal taking shape would not require them to dismantle the country’s nuclear infrastructure.
Arab states including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and Bahrain have all welcomed the talks, preferring diplomacy to an escalating conflict.
“These talks are gaining momentum and now even the unlikely is possible,” Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi wrote on X on Saturday.
The negotiations come against a backdrop of tensions across the Middle East as US airstrikes target the Iran-backed Ansarullah (Houthi) fighters in Yemen and Israel continues its deadly bombardment of Gaza. Last month, Mr. Trump said he would bomb Iran if it did not reach a deal over its nuclear program.
Israel had planned to strike Iranian nuclear sites as soon as next month but was waved off by Mr. Trump in recent weeks in favor of negotiating a deal with Tehran to limit its nuclear program, according to US administration officials and others briefed on the discussions.
“More than ever, Arab States are status quo powers in search of lasting stability, a prerequisite for achieving their lofty economic visions,” said Firas Maksad, managing director for the Middle East and North Africa practice at Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. “Their strong preference is for Iran’s destabilizing activities and its nuclear program to be curtailed through diplomacy.”
Sunni Muslim-led Saudi Arabia and Shia Muslim-majority Iran had long backed opposite sides in regional conflicts, including a grinding war in Yemen that precipitated one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises. The two countries had no diplomatic relations between 2016 and 2023, espousing open hostility.
Prince Mohammed has repeatedly threatened that if Iran obtains a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia will, too. (Separately, the Trump administration has revived talks over a deal that would give Saudi Arabia access to US nuclear technology and potentially allow it to enrich uranium.)
But in 2023, Iran and Saudi Arabia announced a formal reconciliation, mediated by China. By then, Prince Mohammed’s foreign policy focus had shifted toward calming regional conflicts.
“The potential rewards of negotiation look better today than the risk of a regional war,” Ms. Diwan said.
A decade ago, Persian Gulf leaders felt sidelined in the negotiations. This time, Iran has conducted regional outreach, said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa program at Chatham House, a research institute.
“What was striking after the first round of negotiations is that the Iranian foreign minister reached out to counterparts, including in Bahrain,” she said. “Iran wants to have regional buy-in and [Persian] Gulf States are not only supportive of the negotiations but looking to prevent any escalation that could have implications for their economic and national security.”
The article first appeared on The New York Times.