Iran’s vice president for strategic affairs
There is a growing narrative in certain quarters that suggests that Iran, beset by regional pressures, economic challenges and domestic dissent, is shifting its policy toward building nuclear weapons as a last-ditch survival, or deterrence tactic. This view is gaining traction with those who argue that factors such as the setbacks faced by Hezbollah, the collapse of Assad’s government in Syria, and Iran’s economic strains are evidence of desperation among the leadership.
Some have even cited this perspective to call for heightened US “maximum pressure” strategies to bring Iran to its knees; including crippling Iran’s economy, fomenting internal unrest, and militarily targeting its nuclear facilities. This perspective, however, not only misrepresents Iran’s strategic calculus but also reflects a deeper issue: the chaotic state of the world driven largely by Israel’s unchecked actions in the last year-and-a-half that distorts analysis and feeds dangerous misperceptions.
Contrary to claims that Iran’s regional allies provide it a lifeline, Tehran’s strategic deterrence has never depended on these relationships. Liberation movements such as Hezbollah, the Houthis, and others share ideological ties with Iran but operate independently, driven by their own local objectives. Mischaracterizing these allies as “proxies” oversimplifies the complexity of their affiliations and minimizes Iran’s self-reliant defense capabilities.
Resistance to Israeli aggression, occupation and savagery started decades before the revolution. Motivated and energized by the ability of Iranians to resist a globally sponsored war on them by Iraq immediately following their victory over the Shah and his forces, who were also supported by global powers East and West, gave the people of Palestine and Lebanon an extra boost to redouble their resistance against Israel at the height of Ariel Sharon’s savagery (which earned him infamy as “the butcher of Sabra and Shatila”).
Those who are glorifying Netanyahu’s savagery and celebrating the death of “resistance” should remember the Islamic Jihad was created in 1981, Hezbollah was established in 1982, and Hamas in 1987. What ties the timing of the establishment of these groups is not the pouring of Iranian weaponry and missiles into their depots, as Iran was then desperately seeking to procure them itself to defend against Saddam’s forces armed to the teeth by American AWACS, French Mirage jets and Exocets missiles, British Chieftain tanks, Russian Mig jets and Scud missiles and German chemical weapons. The reason these groups were established was instead Sharon’s invasion and occupation of Lebanon and the expulsion of the PLO to Tunisia, creating the illusion that resistance was finished. It was not then; and it is not now. It only grew then, and it will grow now.
Page 2