Muslim Brotherhood, necessity of recalibrating its compass
The Muslim Brotherhood, a movement with deep historical roots and ideological ambitions, has become a controversial entity in West Asia’s geopolitical landscape. While its rhetoric often emphasizes resistance to imperialism and the liberation of Palestine, its actions, whether intentional or not, frequently align with the strategic objectives of the Zionist regime. This paradox has raised serious questions about the Brotherhood’s role, intentions, and internal contradictions.
By Mohammad Ali Senobari
Director of New Vision
Impact of Muslim Brotherhood on regional stability
A clear example of this phenomenon can be observed in Turkey’s policies under the leadership of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), which operates within a framework heavily influenced by the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. Turkey’s involvement in the Syrian conflict, under the guise of supporting democracy and protecting human rights, has ultimately weakened Syria — a country historically regarded as a stronghold of resistance against the Zionist regime. The Zionist entity directly benefited from the disintegration of Syrian state structures and the paralysis of its military capabilities, eliminating a major adversary on its borders. Enemy aircraft conducted hundreds of strikes on Syria’s strategic military stockpiles to neutralize any future threats — all while Turkey and Syria’s new rulers watched.
The parallels between Turkey’s maneuvers in Syria and the emerging strategies of the Brotherhood in Egypt are striking. In both cases, the rhetoric of reform and liberation masked policies leading to fragmentation and instability. If this trajectory continues, Egypt, like Syria, risks becoming a theater of chaos, internal conflict, and the erosion of its military capabilities — a scenario that troublingly aligns with the long-term goals of the Zionist regime.
Zionist strategy of regional fragmentation
The Zionist entity has long pursued a strategy of regional fragmentation to secure its dominance. By systematically weakening neighboring states, often referred to as the “ring states,” it ensures the absence of any credible military threats. This strategy began with Syria, a state whose strong military once posed a significant challenge to Israeli ambitions. The collapse of Syria’s military capabilities due to prolonged conflict has been a major victory for the Zionist regime.
Egypt now stands as the next critical target. With its rich history, strategic location, and one of the strongest armies in the Arab world, Egypt’s stability is of paramount importance. However, the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood threaten to undermine this stability. If Egypt’s military and governmental structures falter, the Zionist regime will find itself even more secure from potential threats.
On the heels of Egypt, Jordan and Iraq appear to be the next candidates for destabilization. Jordan’s strategic location and Iraq’s vast resources make them primary targets. The Zionist regime’s blueprint for the region is clear: dismantling the armies and governmental structures of neighboring states to ensure unchallenged dominance. The actions of the Muslim Brotherhood, whether driven by ideological misguidedness, external manipulation, or internal failures, inadvertently align with this blueprint.
Internal crisis of Muslim Brotherhood
To understand this trajectory, it is necessary to scrutinize the internal dynamics of the Muslim Brotherhood. Once a movement focused on the liberation of Al-Quds (Jerusalem) and the restoration of Islamic dignity, it is now plagued by strategic drift and ideological contradictions. The disconnect between its founding principles and the actions of its current leadership is stark. While grassroots members of the Brotherhood may remain committed to the cause of liberation, the leadership has often adopted policies that contradict this goal.
This internal crisis is exacerbated by the presence of compromised or infiltrated leaders within the Brotherhood. These individuals, whether influenced by external forces or driven by personal ambitions, have successfully steered the movement away from its original course. Their decisions have not only undermined the Brotherhood’s credibility but also made it vulnerable to manipulation by external powers, including the Zionist regime and its allies.
Strategic deception, future
The Muslim Brotherhood’s failure to recognize and confront the strategic deception it faces has been a catastrophic misstep. The rhetoric of democracy and reform has been weaponized against it, creating divisions and fostering alliances that serve external agendas. The Brotherhood’s leadership must confront the uncomfortable reality that its actions, in many cases, have undermined the very objectives it claims to champion.
For the original members of the Muslim Brotherhood, those who genuinely aspire to liberate Al-Quds (Jerusalem) and resist occupation, this is a critical moment of reckoning. They must rise above complacency and inaction, challenging the strategic errors of their leadership. Failure to do so will not only erode their credibility but also implicate them in advancing the Zionist agenda.
The trajectory of the Muslim Brotherhood has profound implications for the broader West Asia. By weakening key states like Syria and Egypt, the Brotherhood has inadvertently contributed to creating a regional landscape characterized by fragmentation and conflict. This environment not only benefits the Zionist regime but also perpetuates cycles of instability that undermine the region’s ability to resist external domination.
The liberation of Al-Quds (Jerusalem), a cause that resonates deeply throughout the Islamic world, cannot be achieved through alliances and policies that weaken the foundational structures of the region. The Muslim Brotherhood must recognize that its current path is unsustainable. A return to its original principles, coupled with strategic recalibration, is imperative.
The Muslim Brotherhood stands at a crossroads. It can either continue on its current path, marked by strategic missteps and ideological drift, or embark on a profound process of introspection and reform. This process must begin with an honest assessment of its role in either advancing or hindering the cause of resistance.
The genuine members of the Muslim Brotherhood must reclaim the movement’s original vision and unite against their leadership’s complicity in adopting policies that serve external agendas. They must prioritize the liberation of Al-Quds (Jerusalem) not merely as a rhetorical goal but as a tangible objective that requires strategic clarity and unity.
The stakes have never been higher. The Zionist regime’s ambitions extend beyond Palestine to encompass the fragmentation and subjugation of the entire region. The actions of the Muslim Brotherhood, whether intentional or unintentional, have so far played a role in advancing this agenda. Now is the time for decisive action. Failure to act will not only tarnish the legacy of the Muslim Brotherhood but also accelerate the realization of the Zionist regime’s expansionist goals.
The future demands courage, clarity, and steadfast commitment to the principles of justice and resistance. For the Muslim Brotherhood and the region as a whole, the choice is clear: recalibration or collapse.