Testing concept of ‘a world without American hegemony’
This historical “zero hour” in Iran means that the US does not occupy a central role in Iran’s political architecture or in its hard and soft power dynamics. A close example is Iran’s unique military architecture, which is relatively sophisticated in both structural design and engineering. The fact that the embassy belonged to “America” is significant since this country has impacted global, regional, and even national governance worldwide. The embassy seizure was, in essence, a test of the idea of “a world without American dominance”—an experiment on which we cannot yet pronounce success or failure as it is still ongoing. Beyond all the positive and negative repercussions of the embassy takeover, which warrant separate discussions, this historical zero hour stands as a strategic advantage that enabled Iran to forge an independent political identity that visibly shaped its power structure at all levels.
Liberation from predetermined historical patterns
Beyond being a historical event, the US Embassy takeover should be recognized as a paradigmatic shift in Iran’s politics—not only in post-Revolution Iran. This zero hour can be seen as the onset of Iran’s distinct independence and identity that has the potential, over a historical horizon, to catalyze significant transformations. Without such historical zero hours, nations are almost destined to repeat past patterns and struggle to construct a new government structure. For countries with deep historical backgrounds, the likelihood of being influenced by previous trends is even higher, as would likely have been the case in Iran had the Revolution not occurred.