Operation True Promise II; crushing blow to West, Zionist regime
In the wake of the recent missile strike by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) against occupied territories, the scale of the blow dealt to the Zionist regime and its Western allies cannot be understated. The operation, known as True Promise II, marked a pivotal moment in both military strategy and geopolitical calculus, delivering a multifaceted message to the global community.
Unlike previous actions, True Promise II demonstrated both restraint and precision, with Iran targeting key military and security installations deep within occupied territories. Jafar Ghanadbashi, an expert on West Asia, emphasized in a recent interview that the missiles used in this operation were vastly different from those used in past strikes. With greater destructive power and extended range, this operation signals a new chapter in Iran’s military capabilities.
But the importance of True Promise II transcends military achievements. As Ghanadbashi notes, the operation was conducted with remarkable rationality and careful consideration of all political, social, and military aspects. Despite the high stakes, Iran refrained from impulsive actions, opting instead for calculated strikes against specific Israeli targets, including intelligence units like Mossad and the Israeli military. This deliberate approach reveals a level of strategic maturity that sets Iran apart from its adversaries.
Moreover, Iran’s leadership sent a clear message: They possess the capability to strike any region within occupied territories and, if necessary, cripple Israel’s economy or depopulate its cities. Yet, their decision to limit the scope of the operation underscores a policy of restraint, showcasing a significant degree of self-control and an avoidance of unnecessary escalation.
Clear legitimacy
In terms of legitimacy, the international community has little ground to challenge Iran’s right to respond. Over the years, Israel has carried out numerous acts of aggression, targeting Iranian scientists, military advisors in Syria and Lebanon, and even violating Iranian sovereignty. As Ghanadbashi points out, international law—particularly the UN Charter—grants every nation the right to defend itself when attacked. Iran’s operation, therefore, stands on firm legal and moral ground, despite the silence of global institutions in the face of Israeli atrocities.
Failure of Israel’s multilayered defense
Perhaps most striking is the failure of Israel’s much-touted multilayered air defense system, a defeat that extends beyond the borders of the Zionist state. The West, especially the United States, which has long been Israel’s primary military supplier and defender, found itself unable to shield its closest ally from the missile barrage. This failure is not just a military embarrassment for Israel but also a devastating blow to the credibility of Western military technology and defense strategies.
As Ghanadbashi argues, this failure will have far-reaching consequences for Western arms manufacturers. The inability of these defense systems to intercept Iranian missiles exposes a critical vulnerability, one that will likely lead to a decline in demand for both defensive and offensive weapons systems. The growing efficacy of missile technology, which bypasses expensive and complex air defense systems, could lead to a reduction in the sale of fighter jets and other traditional military equipment. In short, True Promise II has triggered a seismic shift, not just in the military landscape of the Middle East, but also in the global arms market.
Operation True Promise II represents a strategic and psychological defeat for both the Zionist regime and its Western backers. It exposes the limits of Western military power, the vulnerability of Israel, and the profound imbalance in the region’s military capabilities. The operation sends a message that Iran is both capable and willing to act decisively, yet chooses to do so with restraint and wisdom—an approach that sets it apart in an increasingly volatile geopolitical environment.